YouTube REMOVED THIS VIDEO! RFK Jr. Claims 1989 Vaccine Schedule Overhaul Triggered Surge in Autism and Chronic Illness

YouTube REMOVED THIS VIDEO RFK Jr. Claims 1989 Vaccine Schedule Overhaul Triggered Surge in Autism and Chronic Illness
Reading Time: 6 minutes

YouTube REMOVED THIS VIDEO! RFK Jr. Claims 1989 Vaccine Schedule Overhaul Triggered Surge in Autism and Chronic Illness


Ready to uncover the truth? Sick of the lies? Join our Telegram Channel now. It’s time for the real story! My gratitude to all my readers!


RFK Jr. argues that the 1989 vaccine schedule overhaul led to a dramatic increase in autism and chronic illness rates among children and questions the trustworthiness of pharmaceutical companies and government oversight.


In the realm of public health, few subjects ignite more heated debate than vaccines. For decades, they have been heralded as a cornerstone of modern medicine, eradicating diseases and saving millions of lives. Yet, there is a perspective that challenges the overwhelmingly positive narrative surrounding vaccines, particularly focusing on their potential links to rising health issues. One of the most vocal figures in this debate is Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (RFK Jr.), who suggests that the surge in autism and chronic diseases among children is tied to the 1989 overhaul of the vaccine schedule. He questions the integrity of pharmaceutical companies, alleging they prioritize profits over public safety. This claim has attracted significant attention, so much so that YouTube recently removed his video discussing these ideas for “violating its Community Guidelines.”

The Pre-1989 Landscape: A Healthier Generation?

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. argues that his generation, which largely followed a more limited vaccine schedule, exhibited significantly lower rates of autism and chronic diseases. According to RFK Jr., autism was diagnosed in approximately 1 in 10,000 children during his youth. The data he cites paints a stark contrast to today’s numbers: approximately 1 in 34 children are now diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Such a dramatic spike in cases begs the question—what changed?

In the years leading up to 1989, children received a relatively modest number of vaccines. Parents and health officials alike recognized the need for inoculation against diseases like polio and measles. However, the vaccine schedule was less aggressive compared to the post-1989 model, which introduced more doses and combination vaccines. According to RFK Jr., this significant expansion correlates with a disturbing rise in health problems among children, hinting that the timing might not be coincidental.

The 1989 Overhaul: A Turning Point

What happened in 1989 that marked such a drastic shift? The vaccine schedule underwent a comprehensive revision, increasing the number of doses given to children within their first few years of life. This change, many argue, was driven by advancements in medical science and an ambition to combat a broader range of diseases. However, critics like RFK Jr. suggest that this expansion may have come at a hidden cost.

Before 1989, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and other health agencies advocated for a smaller number of vaccines, spread out over a child’s development. Post-1989, the schedule intensified, with children now receiving upwards of 72 doses by the age of 18, compared to just a handful in prior decades. This sudden shift raises questions about long-term safety, cumulative exposure to adjuvants, and the broader implications for developing immune systems.

Autism Rates: From Rarity to Commonplace

One of RFK Jr.’s most striking points is the rise in autism diagnoses. If you trace the statistics back, autism was once considered a rare condition, scarcely observed in the general population. But today, it has become almost commonplace. The rate has skyrocketed from 1 in 10,000 to 1 in 34, creating a puzzle that researchers have been racing to solve.

Multiple studies have attempted to identify the root causes of this surge, looking at genetics, environmental factors, and even socioeconomic conditions. RFK Jr. posits that the correlation with the expanded vaccine schedule is too glaring to ignore. Critics of his viewpoint argue that the increase is due to improved diagnostic criteria and heightened awareness. However, RFK Jr. and his supporters suggest that even with these adjustments accounted for, the numbers still raise eyebrows.

Chronic Illness in Children: An Unprecedented Spike

Another alarming statistic RFK Jr. highlights is the jump in chronic illnesses among children. According to data he references, before 1989, only 12% of children were diagnosed with chronic health conditions. Fast forward to today, and that number has surged to 54%. This exponential increase encompasses a range of ailments, from asthma and severe allergies to autoimmune diseases and developmental disorders.

RFK Jr. attributes this rise to the significant changes in early childhood exposure to vaccines, suggesting that their cumulative impact might be more profound than initially anticipated. The aggressive vaccine schedule implemented post-1989 coincides with a generation of children who are, by and large, less healthy than their predecessors. While mainstream medicine often dismisses these claims, they resonate deeply with parents and independent researchers who have observed similar patterns firsthand.

Pharmaceutical Companies: Trust and Transparency

Central to RFK Jr.’s argument is the notion that pharmaceutical companies, the entities responsible for vaccine production, may not be as trustworthy as they appear. The pharmaceutical industry has paid out billions of dollars in fines for a myriad of deceptive practices, ranging from false advertising to unethical testing methods. If these companies have a history of misconduct in other areas, RFK Jr. questions why vaccines would be an exception.

The concern isn’t just theoretical. In 2009, pharmaceutical giant Pfizer was fined $2.3 billion for illegal marketing practices related to its products. The question RFK Jr. poses is simple but powerful: if pharmaceutical companies have engaged in deceit for the sake of profit, what ensures that vaccines are held to a different, more ethical standard? This mistrust is amplified by reports that some vaccine studies have been conducted or funded by the very companies that stand to profit from their widespread use.

The Role of Government Agencies

RFK Jr. also points a critical finger at government health agencies. He suggests that regulatory bodies, such as the CDC and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), may not be the impartial protectors of public health they claim to be. Instead, he argues that these agencies have developed a cozy relationship with pharmaceutical companies, leading to a “revolving door” phenomenon where individuals move between public health positions and lucrative roles in the pharmaceutical industry.

This relationship could lead to a conflict of interest, undermining public trust. If the regulatory agencies that are supposed to safeguard our health are potentially influenced by the industries they regulate, questions about the rigor of vaccine safety assessments naturally arise. This alleged entanglement forms a core part of RFK Jr.’s skepticism toward the vaccine narrative that has dominated for decades.

The YouTube Controversy: Silencing Dissent?

Recently, YouTube took down a video of RFK Jr. discussing these topics, citing a violation of its Community Guidelines. This move sparked immediate backlash from those who view it as an act of censorship. The removal of such content raises questions about the boundaries of free speech and public discourse in the digital age. If platforms are quick to silence voices like RFK Jr.’s, are they truly supporting open, democratic debate?

Supporters of RFK Jr. argue that removing this content only fuels suspicion and deepens public mistrust. For them, censorship doesn’t just stifle discussion—it reinforces the idea that certain powerful entities want to control the narrative around vaccines. Critics of this viewpoint, however, defend YouTube’s decision as necessary to prevent the spread of potentially harmful misinformation.

Connecting the Dots: Correlation or Causation?

One of the most controversial aspects of RFK Jr.’s argument is the implied causation between the 1989 vaccine schedule overhaul and the subsequent rise in health issues. The scientific community often emphasizes the difference between correlation and causation, reminding the public that just because two events occur in proximity doesn’t mean one caused the other.

Yet, RFK Jr. believes the correlation is too significant to ignore. He calls for more independent studies that are not influenced by pharmaceutical funding, aiming to explore the potential links between vaccines and the alarming rise in autism and chronic diseases. Whether or not such studies could definitively settle the debate remains uncertain, but RFK Jr.’s call for more research resonates with many parents and advocacy groups.

Parental Concerns: A Real Perspective

For parents, this debate is not just theoretical—it’s personal. Those who live with children affected by autism or chronic health issues are desperate for answers. The post-1989 generation, which has grown up under an unprecedented vaccine schedule, is a stark contrast to the older generation that RFK Jr. points to as relatively healthier. This difference is not lost on parents who question why so many children today seem to struggle with health problems that were rare just a few decades ago.

The voices of these parents are often marginalized in mainstream discussions, dismissed as anecdotal or emotionally driven. However, their observations align with RFK Jr.’s argument, adding a layer of lived experience to the statistical data.

The Call for Transparency and Accountability

The ultimate goal for RFK Jr. and those who share his views isn’t necessarily to demonize vaccines altogether but to push for greater transparency and accountability. The lack of long-term studies on the safety of the current vaccine schedule raises legitimate concerns. Independent research that prioritizes public health over corporate profit is crucial for restoring trust.

What RFK Jr. proposes is not an abandonment of vaccines but a reevaluation of how they are administered and studied. He advocates for rigorous, unbiased investigations into vaccine safety to ensure that public health policy is genuinely aligned with the well-being of the population.

Conclusion: A Debate Far From Over

The debate over the 1989 vaccine schedule overhaul, autism, chronic illnesses, and the integrity of pharmaceutical companies is far from over. RFK Jr.’s claims, whether dismissed or championed, have undeniably brought attention to critical questions about public health, corporate ethics, and the role of government agencies. While mainstream medicine continues to defend the safety and necessity of the current vaccine schedule, the calls for more research and transparency grow louder.

As the conversation continues, the public deserves answers rooted in scientific rigor and independent inquiry. Until those answers are provided, the questions raised by figures like RFK Jr. will remain a contentious and crucial part of the public health dialogue.


Our mission to champion democracy, freedom of speech, and patriotic values relies on the support of dedicated individuals like you. Your contribution is vital in helping us provide insightful analysis, uncover pressing issues, and inspire positive change in our nation.

Join us in our commitment to making a difference. Every donation counts and empowers us to continue our work in advocating for the values we hold dear.

Thank you for being a crucial part of our journey.


SUBSCRIBE MY NEWSLETTER FOR NEW BLOG POSTS, TIPS & NEW PHOTOS. LET’S STAY UPDATED!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *