Explosive Allegations: Malcolm X Family Files $100M Lawsuit Against CIA, FBI, and NYPD Over Assassination Plot
Ready to uncover the truth? Sick of the lies? Join our Telegram Channel now. It’s time for the real story! My gratitude to all my readers!
Groundbreaking lawsuit accuses the CIA, FBI, and NYPD of orchestrating Malcolm X’s assassination. Explosive evidence reveals the government’s role in silencing the civil rights icon.
In a historic legal move, Attorney Ben Crump has launched a $100 million lawsuit accusing the CIA, FBI, and NYPD of orchestrating a deadly conspiracy to assassinate civil rights leader Malcolm X. Shocking new evidence promises to reveal the government’s hand in this tragic chapter of American history.
A Legal Earthquake: Ben Crump Takes on the U.S. Government
Civil rights attorney Ben Crump, renowned for his advocacy in cases of systemic injustice, has set the legal world ablaze with a monumental lawsuit filed on behalf of Malcolm X’s family. The defendants? None other than the CIA, FBI, and the New York Police Department. This lawsuit alleges that these powerful institutions conspired to silence Malcolm X—a man whose voice championed justice, empowerment, and truth.
This move comes not as a speculative accusation but with what Crump calls “explosive evidence” poised to send shockwaves across the nation. The timing is crucial, following the 2021 exoneration of two men wrongfully convicted for Malcolm’s assassination, leaving open the question: Who, then, was truly behind his death?
Explosive Evidence to Expose a Conspiracy
Ben Crump claims to have unearthed groundbreaking evidence that directly ties these agencies to a covert plot to assassinate Malcolm X. While the specifics remain under wraps for legal reasons, Crump’s confidence suggests the existence of irrefutable documentation or insider testimony.
This alleged evidence has reignited debates surrounding the extent of government involvement in dismantling civil rights leaders during the 1960s. Malcolm X, a radical yet profoundly influential figure, had long suspected that his every move was being monitored—a belief that may now carry undeniable proof.
The lawsuit is more than a legal challenge; it’s a demand for accountability from institutions historically mired in accusations of systemic racism and corruption.
Malcolm X: A Threat to the Establishment
To understand why the government may have targeted Malcolm X, it’s essential to examine the revolutionary ideals he represented. Unlike other leaders of the era, Malcolm X refused to dilute his message to appease white America. His fiery rhetoric, advocating for Black empowerment and self-defense, threatened the status quo.
Malcolm X’s shift from the Nation of Islam to Orthodox Islam and his subsequent international travels added another layer to his influence. His pilgrimage to Mecca, where he embraced a more inclusive vision of Islam, symbolized his growing global reach. Yet, these very actions intensified government surveillance, as he became seen not only as a domestic agitator but also as a potential international threat.
Government Surveillance: Malcolm X’s Paranoia Was Justified
Malcolm X often spoke about being under government watch. His claims were dismissed by skeptics as paranoia, but history has vindicated him. From COINTELPRO’s operations targeting civil rights leaders to the recently declassified FBI files, it is now evident that Malcolm X was heavily surveilled.
The FBI and CIA’s interest in Malcolm X peaked after his Hajj pilgrimage. His embrace of Orthodox Islam and his connection to global anti-colonial movements signaled a shift that alarmed the U.S. government. Crump’s lawsuit alleges that this heightened scrutiny was a precursor to a more sinister agenda—one that culminated in his assassination.
The 2021 Exoneration: A Turning Point
The exoneration of Muhammad Aziz and Khalil Islam in 2021, after decades of wrongful imprisonment, marked a watershed moment. It exposed glaring gaps in the original investigation and raised uncomfortable questions about why evidence that could have cleared these men was suppressed.
The acknowledgment of prosecutorial misconduct in their trials added fuel to suspicions of a larger cover-up. If Aziz and Islam weren’t responsible for Malcolm X’s assassination, who was? And why was justice obstructed for so long?
Crump’s lawsuit aims to provide those answers by pointing the finger directly at the agencies that were supposed to uphold the law.
The NYPD’s Role: Complicity or Command?
The lawsuit doesn’t spare the New York Police Department, whose involvement in the events surrounding Malcolm X’s assassination has long been questioned. NYPD informants had infiltrated Malcolm X’s inner circle, reporting his every move back to higher-ups.
On the day of his assassination, security for Malcolm’s event was mysteriously lax. Witnesses have testified that law enforcement was conspicuously absent, despite clear threats against his life. Crump’s legal team argues that this absence was deliberate—a calculated move to create a window for the assassination to occur.
The Bigger Picture: A Pattern of Silencing Dissent
Malcolm X’s assassination fits into a broader historical pattern of government efforts to neutralize dissenting voices. From Martin Luther King Jr. to Fred Hampton, civil rights leaders have often found themselves in the crosshairs of federal agencies.
While Malcolm X was not as closely aligned with establishment figures as King—he notably lacked connections to the influential Rothschild family—his uncompromising stance made him a unique threat. He didn’t seek integration but revolution, a stance that likely made the establishment more eager to eliminate him.
Seeking Justice: More Than a Lawsuit
For Malcolm X’s family, this lawsuit isn’t just about money—it’s about justice. For decades, they’ve lived with the shadow of his assassination and the unanswered questions surrounding it. This legal action represents a bold step toward uncovering the truth and holding the guilty parties accountable.
Ben Crump, known as “Black America’s Attorney General,” has vowed to use every legal tool at his disposal to expose the full extent of the government’s involvement. His fiery rhetoric signals that this battle will be fought not just in the courtroom but in the court of public opinion.
The Implications: A Nation Reckons with Its Past
If Crump succeeds, the implications could be seismic. A victory would force a reckoning with the darker chapters of American history, where justice was subverted to maintain systemic oppression. It would also serve as a stark reminder that no institution, no matter how powerful, is above accountability.
The lawsuit could open the floodgates for other families and activists to demand justice for victims of government conspiracies. It may also prompt reforms to ensure that such abuses of power are never repeated.
A Legacy Worth Fighting For
Malcolm X once said, “Truth is on the side of the oppressed.” This lawsuit, fueled by the relentless pursuit of truth, aims to honor that legacy. As new evidence comes to light, the nation will watch closely, grappling with uncomfortable truths about its past and present.
This legal battle is more than a quest for justice—it’s a fight to preserve the integrity of Malcolm X’s legacy and ensure that his voice, silenced too soon, continues to inspire generations.
Lawyer Ben Crump, representing the family of Malcolm X, has filed a major lawsuit against the CIA, FBI, and the New York Police Department, alleging a conspiracy to a*sassinate the civil rights icon.
Crump claims to possess explosive new evidence that will directly link these… pic.twitter.com/FyEsL9IcOr
— Shadow of Ezra (@ShadowofEzra) November 15, 2024
Our mission to champion democracy, freedom of speech, and patriotic values relies on the support of dedicated individuals like you. Your contribution is vital in helping us provide insightful analysis, uncover pressing issues, and inspire positive change in our nation.
Join us in our commitment to making a difference. Every donation counts and empowers us to continue our work in advocating for the values we hold dear.
Thank you for being a crucial part of our journey.
I’m a 33-year-old writer from Houston, Texas, and the founder of World Reports Today. Driven by a deep love for my country and the timeless values of democracy and freedom of speech, I use my platform and my writing to amplify the voices of those who cherish these ideals and to spark meaningful conversations about the issues that truly matter.
